businessman review (telugu)

I never particularly cared for Mahesh Babu until I saw Athadu when I was visiting India. First day, first show and I was bowled. They say it’s chemistry, and there are different factors at play when one decides to flip over – either way. Since then I like the guy. There is a certain charm to his brusque dialog delivery, the rarely there smile and the body language with which he plays the angry young man with such elan.

I watched Pokiri and I was completely smitten. He *was* what the telugu industry really needed. A handsome hot hero, who will not mince words, or look like he was acting when he looked hot on screen.

Last night, I skipped dinner and made the 8 pm show with a couple of friends. Walked in just as the movie was starting, and almost swooned into my seat seeing our man’s serious profile on the big screen. I whooped,much to the embarrassment of my friends, and fished out my phone, took a picture and tweeted it out. (Occasionally I stray from that level headed woman I claim to be in real life)

I liked the movie in its entirety. If I may be bold as to draw a parallel, I’d compare it to a stypical ARR song. His ongs dont do much for you on the first go, and thenthey grow on you. This movie, and Mahesh’s character grown on you, and as Nasseer puts it much into the movie “The more I hear and spend time with you, the more I am becoming fond of you. You have your ideals alright, just wish you were on this side of the track”

Story:

There really isn’t much of a story, just small details and mafia and a story of one man’s crusade in outwitting a bunch of bigwigs to prove a point. The story’s backbone are the words. It’s like reading a play like Seinfeld. The dialogs are the story. Without them, there isn’t much to hold it all together.

Mahesh’s character was full of analogies. Some worked, a few didn’t. Too caught up in the arrogance of it all, and it did come across like he was preaching.

There is some element of romance in the story, but even that is skewed coz of the character being so strong in his vision, it doesn’t seem right and even hollow when he claims he is in love with her. At least it did to me.

The plot weakened even more and quickly in the last 20 minutes. A few loose ends, and am usually okay with that, coz I do not believe in handing things on a platter to the viewer, but some things didn’t gel.

Language and Action:

Got to know that the language was bad in the movie, so was bracing myself for it. However, I was pleasantly (and thankfully) surprised that all of those words got bleeped out! Really. Every single word that Mahesh uttered that wasn’t right was canceled out by white noise. I think that makes a *huge* difference in the overall effect of the movie. Of course I could guess what he was saying, but not hearing it loud, helps. I came out of the theater pleased and I am positive I wouldn’t have enjoyed it very much otherwise. As in, am no prude and I can cuss when you catch me at a bad time, but free flowing cuss words as part of normal speech is not polished. I like my men (actors) polished.

What did not make sense was his continuous usage of the telugu equivalent of the word b*tch when he referred to this girl he was in love with. See, that didnt make sense to me. The character was not blue collar, he knew what he was doing. When you love someone, you don’t throw cuss at them. That was a serious character flaw, that am pretty sure most self-respecting women would not appreciate. In that regard, I just didn’t get the girl’s character. Heck, regardless of who the guy is, he doesn’t treat me right, he will be kicked out. That’s basic self-respect for you. This is what we teach our girls. So that was not right. Use language elsewhere, why towards this girl, and for no good reason?

Action sequences were intense, and I liked them.

It’s our superhero with everyone else being cardboard effigies scenario. As an afterthought, I’d like to see our “heros” get hurt occasionally. Unless he is wearing his underpants over skinny pants, am losing the super hero charm ever so slightly.

Songs:

Bhaag saala – is arrogant and angry. I guess it was to set the tone of the movie.

Pilla Chao – I don’t remember much of it, but am sure Kajal Agarwal looked all cute.

Sir Osthara – Loved the visuals. The beach and that fancy round medallion all were on.

Chandamama Navve – is sexy and the chemistry between the two is bang on. The infamous kiss they share was really a sorry excuse for one. Raj Kapoor would roll in his grave, the man got this kind of  kiss passed by censors back in 1978. That was disappointing for all that hype.

Bad Boys – No idea what or who the heck that was.

Dance:

I had to put this in, coz I love watching dance choreographs. Not all are graceful, yet they all look great on screen. It’s the duty of the choreographer to fine tune a move to make the guy look good. Mahesh is graceful for his height, but he is tall and lanky and moving that length around requires some thought and skill. I have to look up who the dance master was, but I liked the routines. Simple enough, but different.

Actors:

Mahesh Babu: He’s grown into this angry young man mold so well. Such maturity, control and confidence. He must have believed in the script completely for him to feel, breathe his character in his sleep. One can tell when an actor ceases to be on and becomes his character. Absolutely loved his portrayal of this young man simmering with rage and anger and one that keeps you guessing on his motives till the end. We thought he’s going to turn into an undercover cop at the end, but that would have been too predictable.   A fiery glint in eyes and a smile that bordered on creepy, he played a borderline OCD psycho. Kept himself grounded in some, and let it go in some others. His character sketching alone was commendable.

Kajal Agarwal: She was cute and all that. Showed some sense of brains and rebeled against him. Just wish she was fleshed out more. Girls and women need to be shown a lot more stronger than they are  – especially in Tollywood. I loved her outfits. very chic and cool.

Ayesha Sinha – what was the film maker thinking? No, seriously? I write stories, and a ton of you around do too. When we write stories, we bring in characters for a purpose. They serve a small or large enough purpose. When you edit, you scrutinize and you edit so you make your script/story as crisp as you can. If she was brought in for comic relief, well, I’ll grudgingly accept it. Her accent was ridiculous. Really. I live away from desh, and I rarely meet a young second generation Telugu girl with as heavy an accent as she did. Yes, some accent, not the kind that this “dumb blonde” portrayed. The theater laughed every time she came on, regardless of whether we understood what she was saying or not.

Nasser and Prakash Raj: I respect these two men. They are amazingly real when they take on a character, and really, that is all that needs to be said.

Message:

The movie has been written off as useless. I however, don’t think it can be so easily dismissed. There was a message in there. The film maker got this slightly offbeat thoughts on the ill-society and how it could be fixed. There are always two sides to a coin. It takes some effort to take the quirky, un-used take and see where it takes you. I know, Ive been there many times, and it is most definitely not a conscious act. Mine I mean, not the movie’s.

The dialogs are to the point, no mincing with extras and even the analogies used were (from his point) right on. When he describes society’s hypocritical methods and the touted honesty and purity in ways, they do ring true. Am not commending the thought, but it is a valid thought. One that does hold water. As he also says – You see it one way, I see it the other way, we both are correct in our own ways, but what works for that situation holds and will triumph.

That’s the film maker’s message to his audience. Mahesh delivers it excellently. That said, there were two places where the flow and the transition of message didn’t go smooth. It seemed cliched to have Mahesh become this “lets turn the society around” guy coz of a personal vendetta. That again, could be rationalized, with his dialog as he fights Prakash Raj.

“It’s not just you, You are not the entire reason of me being this way. You also played a role, there were others too. This place needs to be fixed..”

However, after all this, Mahesh comes back witha  steely glint in his eyes, boring through your head, gripping your soul in his gaze and gives you a stern lecture on capitalizing your potential. Have a dream. Achieve it. Live it. Ace the 11th mile, why stop with 10th.

As noble and necessary that message is to the present society, I didn’t get how he arrived there. During the entire movie, it was him, his role, his money, his “bhai” status, his anger. When did the switch flip to him actually taking the effort to motivate the rest of us?

I didn’t get it. Treat them separately, and not as a contiguous cause and effect, it’s all good. Mahesh is effective. Just hope someone is listening.

Rating:

3.5 /5 (I didn’t come out with a headache, and the movie jogged along just fine.)

Final Call:

Can someone please pass a law or something to not have frikkin’ romantic songs in an action movie! Seriously.

Mahesh Babu is a cutie. He’s gotten more angular in his face, but boy, is he hot and cute and all that rolled into one eye candy or what?

Advertisements

24 thoughts on “businessman review (telugu)

    • Ayyoo! Is that what’s in the future already?
      Am quite sure AB jr will be able to pull it off except that the audience won’t give him any credit for it. :|

  1. I heard this movie was a “one man show” meaning it’s all about the hero (a la Chiranjeevi or Rajnikanth style) and all other characters are minor. I wish Mahesh Babu would make family movies like Athadu, Murari, or Okkadu again! Actually, I wish there were more family movies in general.

    • Yeah, I know what you mean. Athadu was a good mix. Family stories aside, am not sure if the audience can take him as anything else now. He’s just so ingrained angry young man like how Amitabh was in the 80s you know?

  2. Are u shobha de’s cousin sister dear? this review seems 2 b more abt u than abt movie.anywayz a gud start bt a lengthy one.

  3. Hello Rads,

    Please answer me otherwise I won’t visit your blog again though it may not affect you in any way.

    You said Telugu industry needs mahesh kind of actors. Does that mean we need an actor who did sensless movies like Dookudu or Businessman? Do we need an actor who acted the same way from 1st movie to Athidi and then started little bit different from Khaaleja and continuing the same again? Don’t we need actors who tries different genres? All we need is masala movies?

    Coming to his performance, why does mahesh always look with anger though a situation doesn’t demand at all? Why does he show anger at heroin when the scene is funny? Does he need to show some kind of anger with eyes? People say it’s intense where is the scope to do that way?

    Do you know what screenplay means? Does Businessman have Screenplay? I never say Businessman has bad screenplay but it doesn’t have screenplay. The director should have written DiloguePlay instead of Story-Screenplay-Dilogues-Direction in title cards. People say great dialogues. They are actually average and Irrelavent few times. What do we call a movie with 1.45 hours dialogues out of around 2 hours run time. Isn’t it a verbose? (even I am becoming verbose to make you understand my views).

    Is action intense and very good? Are you in this decade? Action means senseless attack of a single guy against too many bodies? Is it natural? You didnt even put any compliment on Panjaa’s action which was superb, natural and inserted into narration so well that we don’t believe we are watching action part few times especially in 1st half. But you don’t like that at least you don’t mention that.

    Why does the protagonist walk to anybody, talk to anybody and preach to anybody without even knowing them? Imagine a guy coming to you and speak nonsense. I think you like it very much. Is there continuity between any two scenes especially in 1st half of movie? Is there a logic in any scene?

    Simple Q: protagonist( may be antagonist too due to the treatment) is jailed and his men kidnaps his love. Then the commissioner leaves him out of jail. Ok it’s understood. Then he himself kidnaps her and drives her home. Again cops attack. Then he says he already kidnapped mother of one of the cop. Then they leave him again. Understood. Now the question is why dont the cops try to arrest him afterwards who stooped them?

    Didn’t you observe the love track is almost similar to Pokiri? Even the conflict scene between them is exactly like pokiri where she realizes he is not a good guy during an action sequence. Even the whole mvie is similar to Pokiri but senseless.

    I am sure we are already living in 2012 but

    anybody can go to any guy and talk to them. People can become BHAIS. Cops don’t even care what’s happening. Girls love BHAIS. People get luxurious car without working and earning. People steal a bank. List goes on.

    You want Panjaa to be rated other than A due to violence. Then why didnt you put a comment saying to rate Businessman with even more worse censor rating for it’s vulgarity. Is it mandatory for businessman to utter those vulgar words?

    Please send where you did not understood the dialogues delivered by Pawan in Panjaa. I will send you what those dialogues. He never sticks to a genre and always tries different but you don’t appreciate him and you think Telugu industry doesn’t need an actor like him.
    I believe you wouldn’t have become Mahesh’s fan if he was not handsome. Did Mahesh look any different from one film to other film? Did he look like a mafia guy? Why does handsomeness matter to only a Telugu movie. Why do the same people watch ugly looking actors in Hollywood movies or Thamil movies. But the same people want handsome and fair actors in Telugu. You said Jockie Shroff has carry bags under his eyes and Sarah is so lean. What does that matter to Panjaa movie? Do you even know basic knowledge of film and it’s departments.

    You rate a sensible (not great at all) and technically brilliant film like Panjaa with 3/5 but you rate utter nonsense with 3.5/5. You should have rated it 0 for 0% screenplay and 100% vulgarity.

    Learn about film reviewing and Improve your writing. Don’t think as if you became a great reviewer when People asks you to keep writing.

    This is from huge fan of Pawan who also likes Mahesh. I felt Panjaa is good movie but not as good as few reviewers rated.

    • wow! Dude/Dudette – this is just a blog and a simple writeup of what I liked or did not like about a movie. Am as biased as you are, and you are biased. We all are. I am no way going to entertain all those questions, coz honestly, I don’t have the time nor the inclination or am a movie buff to spend any more time and effort on this movie.
      Some parts were good. I said so. About panjaa and also about Businessman.
      Thanks for your inputs. You must blog, seriously!
      EOD.

      • @Rads The way Keerthy showed his frustration on you and businessman, at the same time praising Panjaa and PK whenever possible shows die hardness towards PK. But I still don’t understand why some people being die hard fans of their heroes, they don’t like other heroes. They treat other heroes are from Pakistan. This happens only in India. Guys grow up. Keerthy is still not able to believe why Panjaa was average and Businessman is becoming blockbuster. Also he is claiming as Mahesh babu fan too. Anybody who reads his comment would never believe it. I don’t know how these people are living in this world with out any moral values. Why would they believe only their heroes are super heroes and others are not? A true fan exists only to the movies not to the heroes.

        A cinema blockbuster status depends on how many people liked that movie and how many people accepted the hero enacted in it. Its all about attracting the crowd. When Keerthy said Dookudu and Businessman are senseless movies that shows he is really a mad dog. Because there are plenty of people who liked that movies, that’s why they are blockbusters. If he doesn’t like it and he want’s everybody to follow his way of thinking, showing the immatureness. Go get a better life.

        Finally Rads a very big congrats to you writing this blog. I have had wonderful time reading your blog. Even though I am a big fan of Mahesh Baby, I watch every damn movie that releases in Telugu. I accept movie on the basis of content and hero acting. To be frank, Businessman story is not that great but Mahesh Babu gave his best performance till date. I was literally smitten by his acting and the growth in his acting since debut.

        • Mr. Japes,

          A movie liked by many people becomes a hit movie not necessarily a good movie. Rajanna, Shubha Sankalpam, rudra Veena, etc… Are all flops. That doesn’t mean they are bad movies. You must realize this first. Did I say I didn’t like Mahesh in any movie? I like him and liked him in Athadu, Murari, etc.. I brought Panjaa in my comment just because she also reviewed Panjaa. I wanted to tell her how she reviewed both movies. If I didnt bring that at all, would you have thought me a fan of Pawan? It’s not me who needs to change or grow up but it’s you who must. There are still people who likes films irrespective of who the actor is. I am certainly one of them. These are all my honest opinions. If you have guts just answer my questions else leave it. I never forced anybody to follow my thinking.

  4. Ayyo, rads, this is too much for me. People are reviewing your reviews? Blah blah blah to them. Whatever happened to just reading and going on if you dislike a blog? I have no clue who the actors and I could care less. But that is because I don’t watch Telugu movies. Heck, I could complain about your not writing about my Kannada movies ;), no? Stoop, stop… I am stopping or is it stooping, whatever. Ta ta bye bye.

Comments are closed.